Found this over on Henry Makow and thought it was worth repeating. Everything this slave owner says and does to break slaves is exactly what the government combined with feminism is attempting with men and women. We already know that feminism is not about equality but about superiority. About master and slave but this superiority is not for all women like they want to believe. It is only reserved for those who want to set themselves up as our masters using the doctrine of feminism against women to create in them that physiologically frozen state of independence the slave owner was describing. How creepy is that? How many times have you heard chicks claim to be independent?
You can also read how the process of breaking a male slave goes right down the line with what the family court system and the cops do to men all over the country. Arresting, beating, tazering and killing them in front of their wife and kids.
The slave owner was right about one thing. Take these things too far and at a minimum the slaves will run away. It worked for me. I left the plantation a long time ago.
Also note the result of what happens breaking up the marriage unit. It goes a long way to explain why single mothers train their boys up to be physically strong but mentally weak. They fear what the system did to their husband or the father will also happen to their kid. They want them strong enough to take a beating but not mentally strong enough to fight back.
The Willie Lynch Letter And The Making of a Slave
This speech was given by a white slave owner in 1712
By Willie Lynch
While Rome used cords of wood as crosses for standing human bodies along its highways in great numbers, you are here using the tree and the rope on occasions. I caught the whiff of a dead slave hanging from a tree, a couple miles back. You are not only losing valuable stock by hangings, you are having uprisings, and slaves are running away, your crops are sometimes left in the fields too long for maximum profit, you suffer occasional fires, and your animals are killed. Gentlemen, you know what your problems are; I do not need to elaborate. I am not here to enumerate your problems; I am here to introduce you to a method of solving them.
LET'S MAKE A SLAVE
I will use the same basic principle that we use in breaking a horse, combined with some more sustaining factors. When we do it with horses we break them from one form of life to another, that is, we reduce them from their natural state in nature; whereas nature provides them with the natural capacity to take care of their needs and the needs of their offspring, we break that natural string of independence from them and thereby create a dependency state, so that we may be able to get from them useful production for our business and pleasure.
For fear that our future generations may not understand the principles of breaking both man and horse, we lay down the art. For, if we are to sustain our basic economy we must break and tie the two beasts together, the slave and the horse. We understand that short range planning of economics results in periodic economic chaos; so that, to avoid turmoil in the economy, it requires us to have breath and depth in long range comprehensive planning, articulating both skill sharp perceptions.
We lay down the following principles for long range comprehensive economic planning:
1- Both horse and slave are no good to the economy in their wild or natural state.
2- Both must be BROKEN and TIED together for orderly production.
3- For orderly future, special and particular attention must be paid to the FEMALE and the YOUNGEST offspring.
4- Both must be crossbred to produce a variety and division of labor.
5- Both must be taught to respond to a peculiar new LANGUAGE.
6- Psychological and physical instruction of CONTAINMENT must be created for both.
We hold the six cardinal principles as truth to be self evident, based upon the following discourse concerning the economics of breaking and tying the horse and the slave together, all inclusive of the six principles laid down about.
NOTE: Neither principle alone will suffice for good economics. All principles must be employed for orderly good of the nation.
Accordingly, both a wild horse and a wild or natural slave are dangerous even if captured for they will have the tendency to seek their customary freedom, and in doing so, might kill you in your sleep. You cannot rest. They sleep while you are awake, and are awake while you are asleep. They are DANGEROUS near the family house and it requires too much labor to watch them away from the house. Above all, you cannot get them to work in this natural state. Hence both the horse and the slave must be broken; that is breaking them from one form of mental life to another. KEEP THE BODY TAKE THE MIND! In other words break the will to resist. Now the breaking process is the same for both the horse and the slave, only slightly varying in degrees. But as we said before, there is an art in long range economic planning. You must keep your eyes and thoughts on the female and the offspring of the horse and the slave.
A brief discourse in offspring development will shed light on the key to sound economic principles. Pay little attention to the generation of original breaking, but CONCENTRATE ON FUTURE GENERATION. Therefore, if you break the FEMALE mother, she will break the offspring in its early years of development and when the offspring is old enough to work, she will deliver it up to you, for her normal female protective tendencies will have been lost in the original breaking process.
When it comes to breaking the uncivilized slave, use the same process, but vary the degree and step up the pressure, so as to do a complete reversal of the mind. Take the meanest and most restless slave, strip him of his clothes in front of the remaining male slaves, the females, and the slave infants, tar and feather him, tie each leg to a different horse faced in opposite directions, set him a fire and beat both horses to pull him apart in front of the remaining slaves. The next step is to take a bull whip and beat the remaining slave males to the point of death, in front of the females and the infants. Don't kill him, but PUT THE FEAR OF GOD IN HIM, for he can be useful for future breeding.
THE BREAKING PROCESS OF THE AFRICAN WOMAN
Take the female and run a series of tests on her to see if she will submit to your desires willingly. Test her in every way, because she is the most important factor for good economics. If she shows any sign of resistance in submitting completely to your will, do not hesitate to use the bull whip on her to extract that last bit of bitch out of her. Take care not to kill her, for in doing so, you spoil good economics. When in complete submission, she will train her off springs in the early years to submit to labor when they become of age.
Understanding is the best thing. Therefore, we shall go deeper into this area of the subject matter concerning what we have produced here in this breaking process of the female slave. We have reversed the relationship, in her natural uncivilized state she would have a strong dependency on the uncivilized slave male, and she would have a limited protective tendency toward her independent male offspring and would raise female off springs to be dependent like her. Nature had provided for this type of balance.
We reversed nature by burning and pulling a civilized slave apart and bull whipping the others to the point of death, all in her presence. By her being left alone, unprotected, with the MALE IMAGE DESTROYED, the ordeal caused her to move from her psychological dependent state to a frozen independent state. In this frozen psychological state of independence, she will raise her MALE and female offspring in reversed roles. For FEAR of the young males life she will psychologically train him to be MENTALLY WEAK and DEPENDENT, but PHYSICALLY STRONG. Because she has become psychologically independent, she will train her FEMALE offspring to be psychological independent. What have you got? You've got the Slave women out in front and the Slave man behind and scared. This is a perfect situation of sound sleep and economic.
Before the breaking process, we had to be alertly on guard at all times. Now we can sleep soundly, for out of frozen fear his woman stands guard for us. He cannot get past her infant molding process. He is a good tool, now ready to be tied to the horse at a tender age. By the time a slave boy reaches the age of sixteen, he is soundly broken in and ready for a long life of sound and efficient work and the reproduction of a unit of good labor force.
Continually through the breaking of uncivilized savage slaves, by throwing the slave female savage into a frozen psychological state of independence, by killing of the protective male image, and by creating a submissive dependent mind of the slave male savage, we have created an orbiting cycle that turns on its own axis forever, unless a phenomenon occurs and resifts the position of the female savage. We show what we mean by example. Take the case of the two economic slave units and examine them closely.
THE NEGRO MARRIAGE UNIT
We breed two slave males with two slave females. Then we take the slave male away from them and keep them moving and working. Say one slave female bears a slave female and the other bears a slave male. Both slave females being without influence of the slave male image, frozen with an independent psychology, will raise their offspring into reverse positions. The one with the female offspring will teach her to be like herself, independent and negotiable (we negotiate with her, through her, by her, negotiates her at will). The one with the slave male offspring, she being frozen subconscious fear for his life, will raise him to be mentally dependent and weak, but physically strong, in other words, body over mind. Now in a few years when these two offspring become fertile for early reproduction we will mate and breed them and continue the cycle. That is good, sound, and long range comprehensive planning.
Almost 300 years later this stuff sounds very familiar. I hope this puts things into a new perspective for some of you. It did for me.
Saturday, November 7, 2009
Friday, October 30, 2009
It's That Time of Year Again
Starting from Halloween until after the grand finally blowout National Vagina Worship Day (Valentines) this is where I submerge completely off the radar not to come back up again until it is all over with. It takes extreme evasive maneuvers and lots of counter measures but it is well worth it. While you married and shacked up guys have your entire holiday free time planned out for you in detail I will be enjoying maximum free time to pursue my own interests.
Naturally the PUAs and Gamers will swoop in to cherry pick your wives and sweethearts pissed off at you for not getting that perfect gift or whatever latest demand they will place on you for access to sex. They play while you pay. Gotta love that. You can read more about how that works from Leykis 101. Not for me though. Too many chicks infected with too many STDs to go venturing into those dangerous waters. They can all have each other as far as I'm concerned.
For those of you that haven't tried and keep caving in to the social pressure to attend the blithering female run holiday functions and gift giving orgies you should try to escape it at least once in your lifetime. Some of you will not be able to handle it but the truly independent and liberty minded will discover a taste of freedom they have never known. After all you have been conditioned since you were a baby that you had to be present at all occasions. You never thought for a moment that no you don't. You accepted it because you are plugged in to the Matriarchx.
In order to unplug successfully you have to start now. Start throwing out those radar decoys by telling everyone who asks that you already have plans. I like to use Church as an excuse. Which is the truth and there are activities at Church surrounding the holidays that is believable but I avoid those as well. When people from the Church ask me I go the other direction and say I have things going on elsewhere. Which is also true because I do. When that doesn't work, I dive deeper and avoid the busy body do gooder control freaks altogether.
Good luck to you, run silent, run deep and happy hunting.
Wednesday, September 30, 2009
Disorganized Resistance and the Men's Movement
The Virtues of a Disorganized Resistance
This is a very good article about the trouble with organized movements which can be applied to the Men's Movement. I hope others pick up on this because of the truth it holds. Any effort on the part of men to organize into a visible movement against an oppressive government will fail for a number of reasons which are outlined in the article. I have been saying the same things for years. I have also been kicked off of MRA boards for saying as much. Which was a good thing in the long run because it prompted me to get off my ass and start my own blog.
I believe that the only effective resistance is a completely disorganized, decentralized, and leaderless opposition.
Now before you say it worked for Feminists remember that the Feminists played the victim card. Men don't do well playing the victim. It's not us. Feminism succeeded because men in the past gave them what they wanted hoping they would shut up and go away. That didn't work. They only cried more and turned into perpetual victims that can never be compensated enough.
You may also say it worked back in 1776 but remember they were fighting an external enemy and not their own government. They left Europe to get away from the oppression until it followed them to the New World. Only then did they form into an organized resistance. To repeat that process you boys would have to go colonize Mars and fight from there under a new flag. Not likely. I think Denis Jones has a better solution.
Organizations can be (and are) infiltrated. Organizations can be taxed. Organizations have legal responsibility. Organizations have membership lists and lists are wonderful tools for the oppressor. Organizations take on a life of their own. They struggle to exist and their continued existence takes priority over their mission. Organizations attract opportunists, power mongers, and attention seekers. Organizations tend to exploit their rank and file for the benefit of their inner circle.
Disorganizations share none of these defects. Bureaucracy cannot comprehend disorganization. Disorganization is invisible. The asymmetry of the relationship between organization and disorganization favors disorganization. Organization depends upon planning. Planning requires predictability. Disorganization cannot be predicted. This leaves organization at a disadvantage.
Organization requires a supply chain. Supply chains can be disrupted. Disorganization depends only upon the resources of its members. Supply chains that do not exist cannot be eliminated.
I do not propose a complete absence of organization. Instead I propose a disorganization of units. Units can be as small as a single individual, or as complex as cell of individuals working together. Cells may be internally organized, but they should not be statically organized cell to cell. The movement should have no commander. It should have no central committee or governing body. No global plans should be made. The modus operandi of each unit should be to think globally and act locally. Ideas, strategies, and tactics should float freely and compete as memes within the medium of the collective conscious.
We need to construct a disorganized movement. You need not apply to join. In fact, it might be better if you did not contact me, or anyone except those with whom you wish to form a unit. Your ideas, strategies, tactics, and lessons learned should be spread anonymously or by word of mouth. When you act, should you decide to act in resistance, attribute your actions to "the Resistance." The growing din of disorganized disruption will be felt as an earthquake. There will be trembles. There will be pre-shocks. The tension will mount and, in time, there will be an earthquake. When that earthquake strikes, the organized edifice of the oppressor will fall like a house of cards.
Even by just refusing to sign a marriage contract (divorce), get a woman pregnant (child support) or let them move in with you (domestic violence) you remove yourself from the chance of getting financially harvested by a system that needs fresh supplies of men to survive on. By simply refusing to participate in your own destruction you are doing more to drop that house of cards than any man begging government to give him rights back he should have never signed away to begin with.
Bottom line is this. Don't join any movements and don't listen to the men that tell you to. They have some agenda that Denis pointed out and it is not in your interest. It is not necessary anyway. The system in place is going to collapse on its own no matter what you do. No nation that beats, tasers, arrests or kills it's own citizens for failing to bow down and worship fast enough ever lasts. I suspect that many of the police and military even hate what they have become. Enforcers to a mafia that exists only to extort as much as it can from as many as it can and kill off everyone else. No sane man aspires to that.
This is a very good article about the trouble with organized movements which can be applied to the Men's Movement. I hope others pick up on this because of the truth it holds. Any effort on the part of men to organize into a visible movement against an oppressive government will fail for a number of reasons which are outlined in the article. I have been saying the same things for years. I have also been kicked off of MRA boards for saying as much. Which was a good thing in the long run because it prompted me to get off my ass and start my own blog.
I believe that the only effective resistance is a completely disorganized, decentralized, and leaderless opposition.
Now before you say it worked for Feminists remember that the Feminists played the victim card. Men don't do well playing the victim. It's not us. Feminism succeeded because men in the past gave them what they wanted hoping they would shut up and go away. That didn't work. They only cried more and turned into perpetual victims that can never be compensated enough.
You may also say it worked back in 1776 but remember they were fighting an external enemy and not their own government. They left Europe to get away from the oppression until it followed them to the New World. Only then did they form into an organized resistance. To repeat that process you boys would have to go colonize Mars and fight from there under a new flag. Not likely. I think Denis Jones has a better solution.
Organizations can be (and are) infiltrated. Organizations can be taxed. Organizations have legal responsibility. Organizations have membership lists and lists are wonderful tools for the oppressor. Organizations take on a life of their own. They struggle to exist and their continued existence takes priority over their mission. Organizations attract opportunists, power mongers, and attention seekers. Organizations tend to exploit their rank and file for the benefit of their inner circle.
Disorganizations share none of these defects. Bureaucracy cannot comprehend disorganization. Disorganization is invisible. The asymmetry of the relationship between organization and disorganization favors disorganization. Organization depends upon planning. Planning requires predictability. Disorganization cannot be predicted. This leaves organization at a disadvantage.
Organization requires a supply chain. Supply chains can be disrupted. Disorganization depends only upon the resources of its members. Supply chains that do not exist cannot be eliminated.
I do not propose a complete absence of organization. Instead I propose a disorganization of units. Units can be as small as a single individual, or as complex as cell of individuals working together. Cells may be internally organized, but they should not be statically organized cell to cell. The movement should have no commander. It should have no central committee or governing body. No global plans should be made. The modus operandi of each unit should be to think globally and act locally. Ideas, strategies, and tactics should float freely and compete as memes within the medium of the collective conscious.
We need to construct a disorganized movement. You need not apply to join. In fact, it might be better if you did not contact me, or anyone except those with whom you wish to form a unit. Your ideas, strategies, tactics, and lessons learned should be spread anonymously or by word of mouth. When you act, should you decide to act in resistance, attribute your actions to "the Resistance." The growing din of disorganized disruption will be felt as an earthquake. There will be trembles. There will be pre-shocks. The tension will mount and, in time, there will be an earthquake. When that earthquake strikes, the organized edifice of the oppressor will fall like a house of cards.
Even by just refusing to sign a marriage contract (divorce), get a woman pregnant (child support) or let them move in with you (domestic violence) you remove yourself from the chance of getting financially harvested by a system that needs fresh supplies of men to survive on. By simply refusing to participate in your own destruction you are doing more to drop that house of cards than any man begging government to give him rights back he should have never signed away to begin with.
Bottom line is this. Don't join any movements and don't listen to the men that tell you to. They have some agenda that Denis pointed out and it is not in your interest. It is not necessary anyway. The system in place is going to collapse on its own no matter what you do. No nation that beats, tasers, arrests or kills it's own citizens for failing to bow down and worship fast enough ever lasts. I suspect that many of the police and military even hate what they have become. Enforcers to a mafia that exists only to extort as much as it can from as many as it can and kill off everyone else. No sane man aspires to that.
Saturday, September 26, 2009
And Now It's Girl Game
Yes my dear and it always has. The only difference now is the fact that so many players are on to your game that is increasingly difficult for you gals to play it. For you boys that don't know how this works I will explain it to you.
You see chicks love sex. They are all about sex. They also like to pretend that they are not about sex. That they have a brain in their head but they don't and all they want is sex. Just look around you. Everywhere you can see chicks in various stages of undress. They can't wait to finish taking off their clothes and bang away. The only problem with this is they don't want to be thought of as a slut because that kills their chances of finding a sucker to be the boyfreind or husband that pays for everything in life. That is something else they want almost as much as sex. A sucker to pay the bills so they are free to bang away even more and maybe find an even bigger sucker in the process.
Now the players think they have discovered something new about all this. That if they just act and talk a certian way they can bag chicks in greater numbers. Basically it comes down to pretending that they not so interested in sex as they are in the girl. It is no secret most women give out free samples to hook a guy in. Especially guys they think may be in to them. That is the Girl Game and usually it works but the players are playing against that so they can tap that ass without paying for it. In greater numbers than ever I must say.
Well, us girls (for the most part) do not need to worry about — nor do we want to have — a numbers game. After all, any moderately hot (7+) girl can probably find ten guys a minute who would sleep with her. But any girl (who’s honest with herself) doesn’t want to sleep with ten guys a minute. Rather, she wants what every girl (if she’s honest with herself) wants: a relationship.
So, while a guy pursues game to become an “alpha”, a girl pursues game to become “girlfriend material.”
Good luck girls, you are going to need it. I think you chicks would have no problems finding boyfriends if you actually were honest with yourselves but you won't do that. You will go right on being more trouble than you are worth like you are the only one in the world with a vagina that no other woman has and the players will go right on pumping and dumping you because they are the only ones paying any attention to you. If only long enough to pump and dump you.
The Truth About Women Folk Feminists
Truth is truth and this guy says things I could never say. I am not interested in race issues per say because I am already fighting the feminist tentacle of the same evil and it does not matter what I say or do most blacks will call me a racist anyway. Just like feminist will call me a woman hater no matter what I do either. Do you see a pattern here? Do you want to know who the real racists and woman haters are? When I say nobody hates women more than a feminist does it is just like when nobody kills black men more than black men do. It is the same thing. It is all the same evil.
I like this video because you can replace white folks with men and black folks with feminists and get the same result, destruction. Worse than that. Blacks kill blacks in far greater numbers than whitey ever could but how many babies have feminists killed? It's in the millions and if you want to talk about servants of the devil feminists are front line human demons when it comes to serving Satan. Anyway if you want the truth here it is.
By the way. For those of you who will inevitably call me a racist, guess what? You and Obama can turn America into South Africa all you want. I went back to Eastern Europe and don't plan on coming back. So there.
I like this video because you can replace white folks with men and black folks with feminists and get the same result, destruction. Worse than that. Blacks kill blacks in far greater numbers than whitey ever could but how many babies have feminists killed? It's in the millions and if you want to talk about servants of the devil feminists are front line human demons when it comes to serving Satan. Anyway if you want the truth here it is.
By the way. For those of you who will inevitably call me a racist, guess what? You and Obama can turn America into South Africa all you want. I went back to Eastern Europe and don't plan on coming back. So there.
Monday, September 14, 2009
The Rarefied Atmosphere Chicks Call A Relationship
The ego epidemic: How more and more of us women have an inflated sense of our own fabulousness
More and more inflated power to you ladies. Just fine with me. I found this out years ago. The extreme altitude you chicks mentally fly at is the cause of this reality hypoxia you are suffering from.
Us women are more egocentric and narcissistic than we ever used to be, according to extensive research by two leading psychologists.
More of us have huge expectations of ourselves, our lives and everyone in them. We think the universe resolves around us, with a deluded sense of our own fabulousness, and believe we are cleverer, more talented and more attractive than we actually are.
We have trouble accepting criticism and extending empathy because we are so preoccupied with ourselves.
Narcissistic black holes of self obsession is what I called them. I was blown away by the attitudes I was encountering. Coming out of the military in my mid thirties and beggining my civilian life was when I started running into these psychoneurotic parasites. They seem to thrive on any kind of attention they could get and it always left me feeling drained of energy.
'These women, however, are unable to get their heads around the fact that the rest of the world might not share the distorted, inflated view they have of themselves.
I guess I'm not the only one who noticed.
The symptoms include: a grandiose sense of self-importance;
CHECK!
the belief that he or she is special or unique and in some way better - either intellectually or physically - than others;
CHECK!
a requirement for excessive admiration; a sense of entitlement, whether to fame, fortune, success and happiness or simply to special treatment;
CHECK!
enviousness of others or a belief that others are envious of him or her; an inability to empathise; an inability to admit a mistake; and haughty behaviour or attitude.
CHECK!
On top of all this they can't understand why nobody wants them.
'One of the cases that brought it home to me involved a 38-year-old businesswoman.
'I knew there were going to be problems right away. As soon as someone joins the agency, we get things moving very quickly - but this wasn't quick enough for this woman.
'She wanted a date immediately. The first man I sent her profile to declined an introduction and she was extremely cross. She couldn't accept it and she couldn't even be polite about it.
'In three weeks, three men turned her down. I explained that it takes time to meet someone but she just got angrier and angrier. She was demanding to know why these guys did this. I was trying to get the balance right - between being honest with her and being tactful.
'I think, ultimately, she had a very flawed perception of herself. And she almost couldn't bear that it was being challenged. It was as if she couldn't deal with the fact that some guys didn't think she was amazing - and she left.'
Aw, don't go away mad, just go away.
Men, traditionally regarded as the more self-centred of the species and the rogues of the mating game, are left scratching their heads and pondering Freud's famous question: what do women want?
They want what they can't have and as soon as they feel they can have it they don't want it anymore.
David Baxter (not his real name) is a 40-year-old management consultant. Previously married for nine years, he joined a dating agency in the summer.
He says he's not perfect, but is told he's an eligible and pleasant guy with a lot to offer.
'I've had three successive dates recently with ladies in the late 30s to early 40s age bracket that have left me dumbfounded,' he said.
'I've never come across such massive egos, such arrogance and lack of basic courtesy.
'It was as if these particular dates were a forum for them to tell me how exceptional they were.
One told me repeatedly how many young guys at the gym asked her out; another was very artificial.
'You sensed that they absolutely worshipped themselves, though none of them was drop-dead gorgeous or had amazing personalities, jobs or anything else to set them apart and elevate themselves into some superior position.
'I also thought it was quite telling that none of them had ever been married, engaged or had recently - or perhaps ever - been in a long-term relationship.
'I got the feeling that these women were living in a Sex And The City-inspired fantasy world. I also sensed that nobody would ever be good enough for them.
'They seem to be looking for something that doesn't exist: Mr Perfect, or perhaps some larger-than-life, dashingly handsome and unattainable character such as that portrayed by Mr Big. Nothing else will do.'
I know what you mean bro and let me tell from experience, they are doing you a favor by driving you off. Better to find out sooner than later when it will cost you a lot of money to get rid of them.
'I know there are a lot of single women who say things like they're too independent, too feisty, too confident or too successful for men. Or they claim that men are intimidated by strong, intelligent and independent women.
'But this is simply not the case. I think they just tell themselves this. It's a way of rationalising things. It's as if it's easier for them to believe their own myths than to face reality - that they are completely ordinary.'
It's the reality part that kicks them in the ass in the end. By the time I hit 40 I realized that these chicks were utterly useless for anything other than worshipping themselves. That is about the same time reality comes crashing in on them but they still have such a long way to fall that it just isn't worth dealing with.
Even then they are just looking for a sucker to finance their retirement. No way was I going to be the sucker after scores of PUA's have had their fun with them. I would say the PUA's could keep them but those guys have already moved on to greener pastures. Part of the reason they start looking for a sucker is when the players are done with them and they aren't getting the hits anymore.
In any case it isn't my problem. Chicks can do what they want and believe what they want. I see them for what they are but I know there are some decent men still trying to figure out what they are doing wrong. You are not doing anything wrong. You simply haven't done your cost benifit analysis yet. Once you do and you will because everyman does it, you will come to the same conclusion most of us already have. They are just not worth the trouble.
The fact is there simply is not enough oxygen for two people up in the rarefied atmosphere chicks call a relationship. There even isn't enough for one. That is why they are so delusional. Do yourself a favor and let them stay up there by themselves. Eventually they all come down but they have a tendency to burn up on re-entry. Not a pretty sight, believe me.
More and more inflated power to you ladies. Just fine with me. I found this out years ago. The extreme altitude you chicks mentally fly at is the cause of this reality hypoxia you are suffering from.
Us women are more egocentric and narcissistic than we ever used to be, according to extensive research by two leading psychologists.
More of us have huge expectations of ourselves, our lives and everyone in them. We think the universe resolves around us, with a deluded sense of our own fabulousness, and believe we are cleverer, more talented and more attractive than we actually are.
We have trouble accepting criticism and extending empathy because we are so preoccupied with ourselves.
Narcissistic black holes of self obsession is what I called them. I was blown away by the attitudes I was encountering. Coming out of the military in my mid thirties and beggining my civilian life was when I started running into these psychoneurotic parasites. They seem to thrive on any kind of attention they could get and it always left me feeling drained of energy.
'These women, however, are unable to get their heads around the fact that the rest of the world might not share the distorted, inflated view they have of themselves.
I guess I'm not the only one who noticed.
The symptoms include: a grandiose sense of self-importance;
CHECK!
the belief that he or she is special or unique and in some way better - either intellectually or physically - than others;
CHECK!
a requirement for excessive admiration; a sense of entitlement, whether to fame, fortune, success and happiness or simply to special treatment;
CHECK!
enviousness of others or a belief that others are envious of him or her; an inability to empathise; an inability to admit a mistake; and haughty behaviour or attitude.
CHECK!
On top of all this they can't understand why nobody wants them.
'One of the cases that brought it home to me involved a 38-year-old businesswoman.
'I knew there were going to be problems right away. As soon as someone joins the agency, we get things moving very quickly - but this wasn't quick enough for this woman.
'She wanted a date immediately. The first man I sent her profile to declined an introduction and she was extremely cross. She couldn't accept it and she couldn't even be polite about it.
'In three weeks, three men turned her down. I explained that it takes time to meet someone but she just got angrier and angrier. She was demanding to know why these guys did this. I was trying to get the balance right - between being honest with her and being tactful.
'I think, ultimately, she had a very flawed perception of herself. And she almost couldn't bear that it was being challenged. It was as if she couldn't deal with the fact that some guys didn't think she was amazing - and she left.'
Aw, don't go away mad, just go away.
Men, traditionally regarded as the more self-centred of the species and the rogues of the mating game, are left scratching their heads and pondering Freud's famous question: what do women want?
They want what they can't have and as soon as they feel they can have it they don't want it anymore.
David Baxter (not his real name) is a 40-year-old management consultant. Previously married for nine years, he joined a dating agency in the summer.
He says he's not perfect, but is told he's an eligible and pleasant guy with a lot to offer.
'I've had three successive dates recently with ladies in the late 30s to early 40s age bracket that have left me dumbfounded,' he said.
'I've never come across such massive egos, such arrogance and lack of basic courtesy.
'It was as if these particular dates were a forum for them to tell me how exceptional they were.
One told me repeatedly how many young guys at the gym asked her out; another was very artificial.
'You sensed that they absolutely worshipped themselves, though none of them was drop-dead gorgeous or had amazing personalities, jobs or anything else to set them apart and elevate themselves into some superior position.
'I also thought it was quite telling that none of them had ever been married, engaged or had recently - or perhaps ever - been in a long-term relationship.
'I got the feeling that these women were living in a Sex And The City-inspired fantasy world. I also sensed that nobody would ever be good enough for them.
'They seem to be looking for something that doesn't exist: Mr Perfect, or perhaps some larger-than-life, dashingly handsome and unattainable character such as that portrayed by Mr Big. Nothing else will do.'
I know what you mean bro and let me tell from experience, they are doing you a favor by driving you off. Better to find out sooner than later when it will cost you a lot of money to get rid of them.
'I know there are a lot of single women who say things like they're too independent, too feisty, too confident or too successful for men. Or they claim that men are intimidated by strong, intelligent and independent women.
'But this is simply not the case. I think they just tell themselves this. It's a way of rationalising things. It's as if it's easier for them to believe their own myths than to face reality - that they are completely ordinary.'
It's the reality part that kicks them in the ass in the end. By the time I hit 40 I realized that these chicks were utterly useless for anything other than worshipping themselves. That is about the same time reality comes crashing in on them but they still have such a long way to fall that it just isn't worth dealing with.
Even then they are just looking for a sucker to finance their retirement. No way was I going to be the sucker after scores of PUA's have had their fun with them. I would say the PUA's could keep them but those guys have already moved on to greener pastures. Part of the reason they start looking for a sucker is when the players are done with them and they aren't getting the hits anymore.
In any case it isn't my problem. Chicks can do what they want and believe what they want. I see them for what they are but I know there are some decent men still trying to figure out what they are doing wrong. You are not doing anything wrong. You simply haven't done your cost benifit analysis yet. Once you do and you will because everyman does it, you will come to the same conclusion most of us already have. They are just not worth the trouble.
The fact is there simply is not enough oxygen for two people up in the rarefied atmosphere chicks call a relationship. There even isn't enough for one. That is why they are so delusional. Do yourself a favor and let them stay up there by themselves. Eventually they all come down but they have a tendency to burn up on re-entry. Not a pretty sight, believe me.
Domestic Violence Shelters For Men
Bank robber wanted time away from wife
Judge sends 39-year-old away to prison for 3 to 6 years
A bank robber offered an unusual explanation Monday for why he held up an Ephrata bank in 2007.
He did it to get away from his abusive wife, he told a judge during his sentencing in Lancaster County Court.
In fact, Anthony Miller, 39, wanted so badly to escape his wife — even if it meant going to jail — that he repeatedly asked tellers during the robbery, "Did you call the police yet?"
"She was very abusive to me," Miller told Judge Louis Farina. "I was scared. She threatened to commit suicide if I ever left her."
Miller's defense attorney, Robert Beyer, said that when the woman, now Miller's ex-wife, came to pick up his car after he was taken into custody, she met with the arresting officer.
After 20 minutes with her, the officer said, "I was ready for jail, too," Beyer dryly noted.
Judge sends 39-year-old away to prison for 3 to 6 years
A bank robber offered an unusual explanation Monday for why he held up an Ephrata bank in 2007.
He did it to get away from his abusive wife, he told a judge during his sentencing in Lancaster County Court.
In fact, Anthony Miller, 39, wanted so badly to escape his wife — even if it meant going to jail — that he repeatedly asked tellers during the robbery, "Did you call the police yet?"
"She was very abusive to me," Miller told Judge Louis Farina. "I was scared. She threatened to commit suicide if I ever left her."
Miller's defense attorney, Robert Beyer, said that when the woman, now Miller's ex-wife, came to pick up his car after he was taken into custody, she met with the arresting officer.
After 20 minutes with her, the officer said, "I was ready for jail, too," Beyer dryly noted.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
