Part Deux of The Sexodus continues. The jest of it is that men who have successfully adapted to their environment are extreme and fringe. This is troubling due to the rapidity with which men are opting out of a rigged game.
Perhaps we shouldn't be surprised. It's little wonder that in the disorientating modern world, men should seek out extreme measures to help them relate to, and get what they want from, the opposite sex. That probably explains the rise of Julien Blanc, who claims his seminars can transform the way women will respond to you. Blanc is at the extreme end of a movement known as "pick-up artists" or PUAs.
Although I strongly disagree with the PUA strategy, at some point it will catch up with them as individuals, I can't argue with their tactics as a group being that they do work. I don't think they are in any state of crisis either. The current situation is a Fracking Boom for PUAs.
Valizadeh has some controversial views on the state of modern womanhood, too. He says: "It's also damaging that the attractiveness of women is rapidly declining, mainly due to the obesity epidemic. No matter what members of the 'fat acceptance' movement say, men have an innate need for fit women. What happens is the few attractive girls left get unimaginable amounts of attention."
The truth is controversial?
According to Valizadeh, today's sexual marketplace represents a Pareto distribution in which "20 percent of the top guys have access to 80 percent of the best women," which has the effect of leaving women holding out for the perfect man, a man who of course never comes.
Yeap, it's polygamy on a mass scale.
Men want normal relationships that include sex, says Valizadeh. Some of them will read pick-up artist books or go to seminars by people such as Roosh V (Return Of Kings) if they don't get it or need to be trained out of "white knight" behaviours instilled in them by a female-dominated culture. (Men have been taught that being a nice guy gets you laid. It doesn't.)
Right again, I tried to be nice and it definitely doesn't work but I'm not turning into Charles Manson either. So if that's what they want they can all have each other. The whole thing is disgusting to me.
What strikes a lot of women as strange is how rational and systematic so much of this decision-making is by men. Many young men literally perform a cost-benefit analysis and decide that women aren't worth the hassle.
No... really? What a shocker. Actually the hassles have always been there. Nothing new under the sun there. What has changed is the punitive measures men face when those hassles materialize that makes it not worth the trouble.
From here it covers some already familiar double standards, then goes into the bizarre and off into territory I'm staying out of so I'll just skip to the end.
The response to part one of this series was colossal. To date, over 300,000 readers have shared it on Facebook. 16,500 readers left comments. Over 500 men wrote to me privately to express their gratitude and support, from every continent and in all age groups. The younger men spoke especially movingly. (Predictably, hundreds of angry feminists on Twitter scorned it as "entitled whinging from white male manbabies," rather proving the point of the story's premise for me.)
Uh hu... yeah.. beginning to understand now are we? There is a reason we call them the FemBorg Collective. They have only one response to all logic...
Reason is futile.
He even plugs MGTOW as a separate entity and not just lumped in with MRA's as a whole.
We can be quite sure now that the sexodus is not some fringe, isolated internet movement as "Men Going Their Own Way" has sometimes been characterized. A combination of disastrous social engineering, special privileges for women, the relentless mockery of white men on the basis of their sex and skin color and the economic and educational abandonment for boys has created one, if not two, lost generations already.
I'll happily take fringe and isolated because there was a time in this country when slaves went from being whipped severely for running off the plantation to getting hung until dead once the idea of freedom became too popular. MGTOW becoming too popularizd may be the reason Barbarossa doesn't like this post all to none.
Nice logo dude.
In the end our fleeting observationalist wraps things up with the usual Parthian shot - men bad / women victims trope but we'll shed some light on that notion as well.
Men created most of what is good about the world. The excesses of masculinity are also, to be sure, responsible for much of what is bad.
To be exact, it is men throwing each other under the bus for pussy is what all the bad is about. If the majority of men ever learned to separate their self worth from female approval there wouldn't be all this violence to get into that top 20% fight club. That's not the nature of most men though so it's not just the Feminists that MGTOW need to go ghost from.
Maybe they just need a little help with this perilous new concept and none other than John The Other aka JTO does his level best to slay that dragon for them.
It's actually a very good explanation of MGTOW but it's all going to fall on deaf ears if he really intends this to be for women. Even if they could understand MGTOW they don't want too. What they do want is to be rescued from it. The reason women understand Chivalry but not MGTOW is because of Female Solipsism. If something doesn't directly benefit women then it simply does not exist or they can't understand it. Not in their self obsessed world. Chivalry is obviously a direct benefit to women while MGTOW is not. Not at the moment anyway. I have seen women attempt to understand MGTOW by redefining it as something else. To them MGTOW only becomes understandable when a man departs from his individualist path to focus all his male utility on women or a woman. When a man directs his energies to supporting, dating or marrying a woman. Then they "get it" then it becomes "understandable". Only then and under those circumstances does MGTOW become a female approved activity for men to engage in. Oh what a miracle. So good luck with that dude but don't play into the trap. They are playing dumb for a reason. Women will never allow themselves to understand MGTOW in it's current form as long as it is of no benefit to them. And that's not how that game is played. MGTOW... They Play Their Games and We Play Ours.
There is an article over on Breibart London concerning men dumping society in general and women in particular that has attracted quiet a bit of attention. As of this morning it has some 14,000 comments and going. I wasn't going to do a post on it because I thought someone else would pick up on it and the stupid page kept crashing from all the ads loading anyway but since I don't see anyone else flagging it I'll put it up here. I did manage to grab the article in between crashes so I'm going to put the thing up without my interruption just because of the fact that it is attracting enough attention that the Feminazis in their zeal for equality may attempt to have it removed. Some speech is more equal than others.
"Nobody in my generation believes they're going to get a meaningful retirement. We have a third or a quarter of the wealth previous generations had, and everyone's fleeing to higher education to stave off unemployment and poverty because there are no jobs.
"All that wouldn't be so bad if we could at least dull the pain with girls. But we're treated like paedophiles and potential rapists just for showing interest. My generation are the beautiful ones," he sighs, referring to a 1960s experiment on mice that supposedly predicted a grim future for the human race.
After overpopulation ran out of control, the female mice in John Calhoun's "mouse universe" experiment stopped breeding, and the male mice withdrew from the company of others entirely, eating, sleeping, feeding and grooming themselves but doing little else. They had shiny coats, but empty lives.
"The parallels are astounding," says Rupert.
Never before in history have relations between the sexes been so fraught with anxiety, animosity and misunderstanding. To radical feminists, who have been the driving force behind many tectonic societal shifts in recent decades, that's a sign of success: they want to tear down the institutions and power structures that underpin society, never mind the fall-out. Nihilistic destruction is part of their road map.
But, for the rest of us, the sight of society breaking down, and ordinary men and women being driven into separate but equal misery, thanks to a small but highly organised group of agitators, is distressing. Particularly because, as increasing numbers of social observers are noticing, an entire generation of young people—mostly men—are being left behind in the wreckage of this social engineering project.
Social commentators, journalists, academics, scientists and young men themselves have all spotted the trend: among men of about 15 to 30 years old, ever-increasing numbers are checking out of society altogether, giving up on women, sex and relationships and retreating into pornography, sexual fetishes, chemical addictions, video games and, in some cases, boorish lad culture, all of which insulate them from a hostile, debilitating social environment created, some argue, by the modern feminist movement.
You can hardly blame them. Cruelly derided as man-children and crybabies for objecting to absurdly unfair conditions in college, bars, clubs and beyond, men are damned if they do and damned if they don't: ridiculed as basement-dwellers for avoiding aggressive, demanding women with unrealistic expectations, or called rapists and misogynists merely for expressing sexual interest.
Jack Rivlin is editor-in-chief of student tabloid media start-up The Tab, a runaway success whose current strap-line reads: "We'll stop writing it when you stop reading it." As the guiding intelligence behind over 30 student newspapers, Rivlin is perhaps the best-placed person in the country to observe this trend in action. And he agrees that the current generation of young men find it particularly difficult to engage with women.
"Teenage boys always have been useless with girls, but there's definitely a fear that now being well-intentioned isn't enough, and you can get into trouble just for being clumsy," he says. "For example, leaning in for a kiss might see you branded a creep, rather than just inept."
The new rules men are expected to live by are never clearly explained, says Rivlin, leaving boys clueless and neurotic about interacting with girls. "That might sound like a good thing because it encourages men to take the unromantic but practical approach of asking women how they should behave, but it causes a lot of them to just opt out of the game and retreat to the sanctuary of their groups of lads, where being rude to women gets you approval, and you can pretty much entirely avoid one-on-one socialising with the opposite sex."
"There are also a lot of blokes who ignore women because they are scared and don't know how to act. It goes without saying that boys who never spend any time alone with women are not very good at relationships."
Rivlin has noticed the increased dependence on substances, normally alcohol, that boys are using to calm their nerves. "I've heard a lot of male students boast about never having experienced sober sex," he says. "They're obviously scared, which is natural, but they would be a lot less scared and dysfunctional if they understood 'the rules.'"
The result? "A lot of nice but awkward young men are opting out of approaching women because there is no opportunity for them to make mistakes without suffering worse embarrassment than ever."
Most troublingly, this effect is felt more acutely among poorer and less well educated communities, where the package of support resources available to young men is slight. At my alma mater, the University of Cambridge, the phenomenon barely registers on the radar, according to Union society president Tim Squirrell.
"I don't think I've really noticed a change recently," he says. "This year has seen the introduction of mandatory consent workshops for freshers, which I believe is probably a good thing, and there's been a big effort by the Women's Campaign in particular to try and combat lad culture on campus.
The atmosphere here is the same as it was a year ago - mostly nerdy guys who are too afraid to approach anyone in the first place, and then a smaller percentage who are confident enough to make a move. Obviously women have agency too, and they approach men in about the same numbers as they do elsewhere. There certainly haven't been any stories in [campus newspaper] The Tab about a sex drought on campus."
"I think that people are probably having as much sex as ever," he adds. At Cambridge, of course, that may not mean much, and for a variety of socioeconomic and class-based reasons the tribes at Oxford and Cambridge are somewhat insulated from the male drop-out effect.
But even at such a prestigious university with a largely middle- and upper-class population, those patronising, mandatory "consent" classes are still being implemented. Squirrell, who admits to being a feminist with left-of-centre politics, thinks they're a good idea. But academics such as Camille Paglia have been warning for years that "rape drives" on campus put women at greater risk, if anything.
Women today are schooled in victimhood, taught to be aggressively vulnerable and convinced that the slightest of perceived infractions, approaches or clumsy misunderstandings represents "assault," "abuse" or "harassment." That may work in the safe confines of campus, where men can have their academic careers destroyed on the mere say-so of a female student.
But, according to Paglia, when that women goes out into the real world without the safety net of college rape committees, she is left totally unprepared for the sometimes violent reality of male sexuality. And the panics and fear-mongering are serving men even more poorly. All in all, education is becoming a miserable experience for boys.
In schools today across Britain and America, boys are relentlessly pathologised, as academics were warning as long ago as 2001. Boyishness and boisterousness have come to be seen as "problematic," with girls' behaviour a gold standard against which these defective boys are measured. When they are found wanting, the solution is often drugs.
Meanwhile, boys are falling behind girls academically, perhaps because relentless and well-funded focus has been placed on girls' achievement in the past few decades and little to none on the boys who are now achieving lower grades, fewer honors, fewer degrees and less marketable information economy skills. Boys' literacy, in particular, is in crisis throughout the West. We've been obsessing so much over girls, we haven't noticed that boys have slipped into serious academic trouble.
So what happened to those boys who, in 2001, were falling behind girls at school, were less likely to go to college, were being given drugs they did not need and whose self-esteem and confidence issues haven't just been ignored, but have been actively ridiculed by the feminist Establishment that has such a stranglehold on teaching unions and Left-leaning political parties?
In short: they grew up, dysfunctional, under-served by society, deeply miserable and, in many cases, entirely unable to relate to the opposite sex. It is the boys who were being betrayed by the education system and by culture at large in such vast numbers between 1990 and 2010 who represent the first generation of what I call the sexodus, a large-scale exit from mainstream society by males who have decided they simply can't face, or be bothered with, forming healthy relationships and participating fully in their local communities, national democracies and other real-world social structures.
The sexodus didn't arrive out of nowhere, and the same pressures that have forced so many millennials out of society exert pressure on their parent's generation, too. One professional researcher in his late thirties, about whom I have been conversing on this topic for some months, puts it spicily: "For the past, at least, 25 years, I've been told to do more and more to keep a woman. But nobody's told me what they're doing to keep me.
"I can tell you as a heterosexual married male in management, who didn’t drop out of society, the message from the chicks is: 'It's not just preferable that you should fuck off, but imperative. You must pay for everything and make everything work; but you yourself and your preferences and needs can fuck off and die.'"
Women have been sending men mixed messages for the last few decades, leaving boys utterly confused about what they are supposed to represent to women, which perhaps explains the strong language some of them use when describing their situation. As the role of breadwinner has been taken away from them by women who earn more and do better in school, men are left to intuit what to do, trying to find a virtuous mean between what women say they want and what they actually pursue, which can be very different things.
Men say the gap between what women say and what they do has never been wider. Men are constantly told they should be delicate, sensitive fellow travellers on the feminist path. But the same women who say they want a nice, unthreatening boyfriend go home and swoon over simple-minded, giant-chested, testosterone-saturated hunks in Game of Thrones. Men know this, and, for some, this giant inconsistency makes the whole game look too much like hard work. Why bother trying to work out what a woman wants, when you can play sports, masturbate or just play video games from the comfort of your bedroom?
Jack Donovan, a writer based in Portland who has written several books on men and masculinity, each of which has become a cult hit, says the phenomenon is already endemic among the adult population. "I do see a lot of young men who would otherwise be dating and marrying giving up on women," he explains, "Or giving up on the idea of having a wife and family. This includes both the kind of men who would traditionally be a little awkward with women, and the kind of men who aren't awkward with women at all.
"They've done a cost-benefit analysis and realised it is a bad deal. They know that if they invest in a marriage and children, a woman can take all of that away from them on a whim. So they use apps like Tinder and OK Cupid to find women to have protected sex with and resign themselves to being 'players,' or when they get tired of that, 'boyfriends.'"
He goes on: "Almost all young men have attended mandatory sexual harassment and anti-rape seminars, and they know that they can be fired, expelled or arrested based more or less on the word of any woman. They know they are basically guilty until proven innocent in most situations." Donovan lays much of the blame for the way men feel at the door of the modern feminist movement and what he sees as its disingenuousness. "The young men who are struggling the most are conflicted because they are operating under the assumption that feminists are arguing in good faith," he says, "When in fact they are engaged in a zero-sum struggle for sexual, social, political and economic status—and they're winning.
"The media now allows radical feminists to frame all debates, in part because sensationalism attracts more clicks than any sort of fair or balanced discourse. Women can basically say anything about men, no matter how denigrating, to a mix of cheers and jeers."
Donovan has views on why it has been so easy for feminists to triumph in media battles. "Because men instinctively want to protect women and play the hero, if a man writes even a tentative criticism of women or feminism, he's denounced by men and women alike as some kind of extremist scoundrel. The majority of "men's studies" and "men's rights" books and blogs that aren't explicitly pro-feminist are littered with apologies to women.
"Books like The Myth of Male Power and sites like A Voice for Men are favourite boogeymen of feminists, but only because they call out feminists' one-sided hypocrisy when it comes to pursing 'equality.'"
Unlike modern feminists, who are driving a wedge between the sexes, Men's Rights Activists "actually seem to want sexual equality," he says. But men's studies authors and male academics are constantly tip-toeing around and making sure they don't appear too radical. Their feminine counterparts have no suchforbearance, of course, with what he calls "hipster feminists," such as the Guardian's Jessica Valenti parading around in t-shirts that read: "I BATHE IN MALE TEARS." "I'm a critic of feminism," says Donovan. "But I would never walk around wearing a shirt that says, "I MAKE WOMEN CRY." I'd just look like a jerk and a bully."
It's the contention of academics, sociologists and writers like Jack Donovan that an atmosphere of relentless, jeering hostility to men from entitled middle-class media figures, plus a few confused male collaborators in the feminist project, has been at least partly responsible for a generation of boys who simply don't want to know.
In Part 2, we'll meet some of the men who have "checked out," given up on sex and relationships and sunk into solitary pursuits or alcohol-fuelled lad culture. And we'll discover that the real victims of modern feminism are, of course, women themselves, who have been left lonelier and less satisfied than they have ever been.
A little bit of shaming going on here but overall it's true. Men do get confused by all the conflicting messages and I think that is intentional. It is designed that way so men can be taken advantage of in their confusion or Blue Pill state but sooner or later every man does do his own cost benefit analysis, swallows that Red Pill and figures out that it isn't worth all the trouble.
"I can tell you as a heterosexual married male in management, who didn’t drop out of society, the message from the chicks is: 'It's not just preferable that you should fuck off, but imperative. You must pay for everything and make everything work; but you yourself and your preferences and needs can fuck off and die.'" That dude is right, that is exactly their attitude and exactly the attitude I was running into and as a result of this prevailing attitude The Exodus by men is what follows. All that shaming and manipulation to keep men on the plantation does work at first but inadvertently results in them leaving it. It gets to be too much, too soon and too obvious. Again, I think that is intentional but on a level higher than societal where women and society are just the useful idiots in the process to keep men and women at war with one another. My war is over though and that is the brilliant part of MGTOW. By simply leaving the battlefield I win and so does each man that does the same. That doesn't mean the parasites won't come after us, they most certainly will but they will have to catch us first and we already have a head start on them. MGTOW... OMW To The Promised Land.
Paul Joseph Watson of InfoWars picks up on the story.
Yes he does use the term White Knight and gets that it doesn't work for men. I suspect he has been researching the Man-O-Sphere and will likely out it at some point. He certainly isn't a Feminist Mangina and understand how Feminism with all it's insanity is the tip of the spear in the Divide and Conquer strategy for those determined to destroy humanity.
I have been seeing the concept of MGTOW spilling out in comment sections all over the internet for quiet a while so it was only a matter of time before other men who are not MGTOW per say picked up on the idea to figure out what it was. G4T, a popular You Tube figure has taken up the challenge. He says he understands where MGTOW are coming from but the idea isn't for him... maybe. Ok by me, things seem to be working out for him but as we well know around here that could all change in an instant.
Although Feminists would accuse me of hating women the truth is I'm simply indifferent, I don't care anymore. Sure there was a time, long ago when I was mad and angry but as was so often pointed out to me "you need to get over it"... I did. I got over it alright but I don't think it was in the direction they were counting on. Where he can't see himself being without a woman I can't see myself ever with one, not in this current toxic environment anyway. In the past each time that relationship noose began to tighten around my neck, where the expectation was for me to make even greater sacrifices without expecting anything in return I had the overwhelming sense of self preservation to slip the knot. Having tried the LTR thing I already know it doesn't work for me and of course marriage is not an option. Even the PUAs would agree here that Marriage 2.0 is off the table forever. So go tell him what you think, I believe he will give MGTOW a fair shake and even help other men realize they have been MGTOW but didn't have a name for it.
After all don't women have the right to serve in combat just like any other man does? I already know the answer to that one, some jobs are more equal than others but I'll put it out there so everyone else can observe the conspicuous silence from the likes of Feministing and others. They're too busy carping on about Cosby and so called street harassment or rather that lack thereof directed at them.
The life of a Feminist must be a lonely one but as for some real harassment, not a peep from them I'm sure.
I’m going to kill you when I find you. Don’t think I won’t; I know where you and your parents live and all I’ll need is one phone call to kill you all.
Re: Watch your back.
You don’t need to “find” me. My address is 9175 Kornbrust Circle, Lone Tree, CO 80124.
Luckily for you, there are daily direct flights from Heathrow to Denver. Here’s what you will need to do: After arriving at Denver and passing through customs, you will need to catch the shuttle to the rental car facility. Once in your rental car, take Pena Boulevard to I-225 south. Proceed on I-225 south to I-25 south. Proceed south on I-25 to Lincoln Avenue which is exit 193. Turn right (west) onto Lincoln. Proceed west to the fourth light, and turn left (south) onto Ridgegate Boulevard. Proceed south, through the roundabout to Kornbrust Drive. Turn left onto Kornbrust Drive and then take an immediate right onto Kornbrust Circle. I’m at 9175.
Just do me one favor. PLEASE wear body armor. I have some new ammunition that I want to try out, and frankly, close-quarter body shots without armor would feel almost unsporting from my perspective. That and the fact that I’m probably carrying a good 50 I.Q. points on you makes it morally incumbent upon me to spot you a tactical advantage.
However, being that you are a miserable, trembling coward, I realize that you probably are incapable of actually following up on any of your threats without losing control of your bowels and crapping your pants while simultaneously sobbing yourself into hyperventilation. So, how about this: why don’t you contact the main mosque here in Denver and see if some of the local musloids here in town would be willing to carry out your attack for you?
After all, this is what your “perfect man” Mohammed did (pig excrement be upon him). You see, Mohammed, being a miserable coward and a con artist, would send other men into battle to fight on his behalf. Mohammed would stay at theback of the pack and let the stupid, ignorant suckers like you that he had conned into his political cult do the actual fighting and dying. Mohammed would then fornicate with the dead men’s wives and children. You should follow Mohammed’s example!
Here is the contact info for the main mosque here in Denver:
Masjid Abu Bakrf
Imam Karim Abu Zaid
2071 South Parker Road
Denver, CO 80231
I’m sure they would be delighted to hear from you. Frankly, I’m terribly disappointed that not a single musloid here in the United States has made ANY attempt to rape and behead me. But maybe I haven’t made myself clear enough, so let me do that right now:
I will never, ever, ever submit to Islam. I will fight Islam with every fiber of my being for as long as I live because Islam is pure satanic evil. If you are really serious about Islam dominating the United States and the world, you are going to have to come through me. You are going to have to kill me. Good luck with that.
And understand that if you or some of your musloid boyfriends do actually manage to kill me, The Final Crusade will officially commence five minutes later, and then, despite your genetic mental retardation, you will be made to understand with crystal clarity what the word “defeat” means. Either way, I win, so come and get it.
Deo adjuvante non timendum (with the help of God there is nothing to be afraid of).
Mass murderer Charles Manson plans to marry a 26-year-old woman who left her Midwestern home and spent the past nine years trying to help exonerate him.
Afton Elaine Burton, the raven-haired bride-to-be, said she loves the man convicted in the notorious murders of seven people, including pregnant actress Sharon Tate.
Burton, who goes by the name "Star," told the AP that she and Manson will be married next month.
"Y'all can know that it's true," she said. "It's going to happen."
"I love him," she added. "I'm with him. There's all kinds of things."
There you go ladies, if you wonder what happened to all the "good" men it appears they have been hiding out in prison the whole time. But as for the rest of us, I guess we'll just have to accept are losses.
Feminists are enraged over a viral video showing various Star Wars characters catcalling Princess Leia as she walks through New York City because they claim it “trivializes” street harassment.
Ha, that was funny and as we know around here it doesn't take a whole lot to rattle their cages either.
Another video commenter, Ashleigh N., claimed the Leia video “completely trivializes the actual struggles shared by women everyday” while reinforcing “the institutionalized racism fueled by xenophobia, classism, and white privilege.”
“If you need to ask why, you probably need to check you privilege,” she wrote.
And one Twitter user simply called the video “****ing disgusting.”
“Yeah because harassment needs to be made into a parody,” she tweeted. “This is ****ing disgusting.”
Brilliant, that's what the Death Star sounds like when it takes a direct hit. Be sure to download and save these videos before the predictable collective feminist temper tantrum does get them yanked from the internet. MGTOW... May The Man Force Be WIth You.
Isn't this typical. All the endless catering to the women and the marginalization of men within the church has led to one completely unpredictable result. The men in turn have abandoned the church. Who would have ever guessed that would happen? It's ok though because the church has come up with a solution to this very problem. I'm sure you will never guess what that is either. Not in a million years. Wait for it.... Wait... Here it comes...
BOOM!!!... SURPISE!!!... YAAAY!!!... WOO HOOO!!! Now why didn't I think of that?
If the ladies will pardon me (for women have their own sort of strength), I want to issue a special summons to men, especially fathers, husbands, and priests. The summons is simple: be a man.
Pardon me ladies but you can kiss my ass. WTF? This is the whole problem in a nutshell. If you want to save the churches from burning to the ground stop pouring gasoline on the fire!
Stop coddling to these church ladies and start booting the trouble makers out. Start calling these con artists out for what they are. Professional Victims. But since the churches will never do that it leaves me no choice but to boot them along with the chruch out of my life and by virtue of yet another one of these "Man Up" S.O.S. posts from the sinking ship I'm not the only one who has come to that same conclusion.
It has often been observed that men are rather disengaged from the practice of the faith and attendance at the Sacred Liturgy. Frankly, there is a reason—not a politically correct one, but a reason nonetheless. Most of the men I talk to find the Church rather feminized. There is much talk in the Church about forgiveness and love, about receptivity and about being “nicer.” These are fine virtues, all of them necessary. But men also want to be engaged, to be sent into battle, to go forth and make a difference.
Wrong again, men want to know they are not going to get sold out by the very people who are asking them to go out and fight those battles. Meaning stop automatically shunning the men who are still left fighting the battles the nanosecond his Christian In Name Only wife files for divorce because she is not haaaaapppeeeee.... Don't assume just because she files for divorce and says he is the bad guy that there is any truth to it. Above all stop letting them get remarried after the first divorce. I think it actually says that somewhere in the Bible. The church has got to start enforcing its own rules before it can ask men anything more of them otherwise men will man up by putting their foot down on the church.
After years of radical feminism, men are shamed for seeking to take up leadership and authority in their families and in the Church. It starts early. Any normal boy is full of spit and vinegar, is aggressive, competitive, and anxious to test his wings. But many boys are scolded, punished, and even medicated for these normal tendencies. They are told to behave more like girls and to learn to be nicer and to get along, etc. It will be granted that limits are necessary, but the tendency for boys to roughhouse is normal. The scolding and “socializing” to more feminine traits continues apace into early adulthood. And then there are other cultural phenomena such as the slew of “Men are stupid” commercials, etc.
Oh that's right, men are stupid, thanks for reminding me, so why do you need us again?
Though many in past decades have sought to describe the Church as “male-dominated,” nothing could be further from the truth. Most parish leadership structures are dominated by women. And women do fine work. But the Church has done a very poor job of engaging men as men and equipping them to be strong husbands, fathers, and priests. Virtues related to bold leadership and the effective use of authority are in short supply whereas other virtues such as collaboration, listening, empathy, and understanding are overemphasized.
This lack of balance, wherein traditionally manly virtues are downplayed—even shamed—has led many men to become disengaged from the Church.
Who's fault is that? Who let them take over when they should have been kicking them to the curb? How is this my problem? It's not and the reason men have been abandoned by the church is because the church has abandoned God first. In the place of God is the worship of women. The worship of their feelings. Everything is geared towards them. They can do no wrong and of course men are the devil. Everything that men do is somehow wrong though but men are wising up to the scam. We already know that the "Man Up" bait is only a trap. An opportunity for the Victim Class to carp on even more about how everything men do for the church is wrong.
Fine with me because I'm not falling for it anyway and I'm pretty sure that increasingly I'm not the only one either.
How many times have I heard that one or some variation there of? That is the mantra of the single mother. Her kid has top priority in her life, as it should be but it is for that reason men should avoid single mothers at all times. Any man that does seek the "privilege" of dating / shacking up with her had better make her kid come first too. She will settle for nothing less. But what happens when it's the other way around? What happens when it comes to single dads? Do you really think females are going to put that guys kid first in her life? I bet you all know the answer to that one already.
A 28-year-old woman was sentenced Thursday to three years in prison for planting a pistol in a child’s backpack and anonymously reporting him to the school.
Heather Hodges, who pleaded guilty to unlawful carrying of a weapon on restricted premises in exchange for the dismissal of two lesser charges, was the live-in girlfriend of the boy’s father but they had struggled as a blended family.
Hodges wanted to teach 13-year-old James Bailey McKeegan a lesson for what she considered to be the mistreatment of her own children, ages seven and four.
So she took her boyfriend’s 9-millimeter Smith and Wesson handgun, replaced the child’s cologne and deodorant in his backpack, and then called Magnolia Junior High School from a nearby payphone to report him by name.
Judge Case echoed lead prosecutor Santini’s statement that Hodges was “evil,” and said he thought it was ironic how Hodges’ motivation was wanting to protect her children.
McKeegan was eventually taken from school to the Montgomery County’s juvenile detention facility until Hodges confessed days later, after multiple interviews with investigators.
He no longer lives with his father and has since moved to Louisiana to stay with his mother.
A MGTOW is born I guarantee it and he will be out of his mothers house the microsecond he turns 18 never looking back on the whole thing. I was already MGTOW when something like this happened to me. Actually the target was my pussy begging F'ing dip chit PUA room mate who like all PUAs think they have all the Game in the world right up until at least ten cops were beating down my door and wildly pointing their guns at his head and mine too. All because one of his Pump and Dumps didn't take to well to the Dump part of it. Yeah, I know just how evil women can be but it wouldn't be happening if they didn't get all the help from the police state that they do.
“(McKeegan’s) life will never be the same,” Judge Case told Hodges in sentencing. “It bothers me greatly. I have a bigger issue, and that’s the school. Children going to school need to be safe. They don’t need to be worried about having guns show up at school. This is not Beirut. This is Montgomery County, Texas. For whatever reason you decided to blame that child, I find irrelevant. The fact that you’re not on drugs, or have a major personality disorder puts you in the category of being someone I would call ‘evil.’
Almost sounds like that Judge wanted to give her a pass but I got some bad news for the guy. The drugs and personality disorders are only the excuses a White Knight would be looking for. I bet his judgment isn't as clouded when men use those same excuses and probably adds even more time to their sentences for it.
“I cannot fathom why you thought this would be a good idea. It makes no sense to me.”
It makes perfect sense to us here in the Manosphere who have no illusions about the evil nature of women. They do not care about anything outside of themselves or little carbon copies of themselves. Anything else in their solipsistic world that doesn't exist to serve her or her children has to go. To her the boy had to go.
No better way to get rid of him than by manipulating the White Knights within the police state to do the dirty work for her. Which is standard operating procedure for females now days. She was probably hoping the cops would do what they normally do under an anonymous tip about a *gasp* gun. Show up and start shooting everyone and their pets. Gee I wonder where the incentives for these "ideas" come from? This should also serve as a warning to men who think the same measures applied to females as it is to men is going to yield the same results. That this is what their attitude really is when it comes to them accepting of a man's children from another woman. It doesn't happen and men should not be giving any women a chance to prove it. MGTOW... Doing what's in the best interests of myself for a change.
Judging by the last video it should be obvious to any reasonable man that this society is overdue for a collapse. Which is fine with me because there is nothing in it for me anyway. Their civilization is not mine and I want nothing to do with it, if I can help it. I'm not just talking about Feminism here. Feminism is only the cultural canary in the coal mine. There are much worse things going on behind it. It's just that it is the last warning of what is about to come.
Think of how society was when the Roman women were throwing their babies into the garbage piles or ancient Israel offering their children to Baal and what followed as a result. That is where this society is at today. So not only do I lose nothing from it collapsing, good riddance, I can actually make some money while it drives itself down. So can you.
You can do it by shorting it or selling ahead of the fall. Without having to actually short sell or get into options trading it is just as easy to buy into certain ETFs that do all that for you already. But first let's look at the big picture and there is no bigger picture of the financial market than the $SPX.
As you can see the SP500 has been having a nice run since 2009. Completely opposite of what is happening in reality but I'm not getting into that because no matter how rigged this game is, at some point the laws of nature, of physics, of gravity will come into play. When it does it just means the fall will be greater than what it would have been if the market wasn't corrupted by a financial oligarchy. Who by the way are the ones financing the Feminist movement in order to move women from one kitchen to another, to theirs. They just don't call them kitchens they call them careers. Most women took the bait, bought the lie and drank the Kool Aid. So what happens next economically is going to be their problem, not mine. What I think is about to happen will look something like this at first.
Then as the real reality of the overall situation sets in it will look more like this.
Even that chart is a bit optimistic with a low of 1000. I put the $SPX at around 600 and being that this market and society is so evil I will probably cover my shorts right at 666 just to prove the point, ha. Ok so how can you get in on this action?
Understand that I'm not selling this stuff. I'm just giving an example of something easy to work with in order to trade the market on the way down. As you can see it is low because the market is high. It is going to do just the opposite of what the SP500 does. That's how this thing works. That means all you have to do is buy low, sell high and enjoy the decline. MGTOW... Fiddling while Rome burns.